« Romney to S.C. | Main | The Friday Freakley briefing »
Friday, 26 January 2007
Diocese settles sex abuse claims
This afternoon was so busy, I was letting the machine get the phone, and I missed a call from the Bishop giving me a heads-up on the following news, which I will now share with you:
CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) - The Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston announced Friday it will settle child sex abuse claims in South Carolina, designating as much as $12 million for damages.
"It is my fervent hope that this settlement will allow us, as the Catholic community of faith in South Carolina, to bring closure to an ugly period in our history," Bishop Robert Baker said.
The class-action settlement has been given initial approval by a state judge, said Larry Richter, an attorney for four victims whose claims were settled last summer.
Peter Shahid Jr., an attorney representing the diocese, said the church knows of at least eight other victims although others may come forward.
Under the settlement, abuse victims could get anywhere from $10,000 to $200,000 while spouses and parents would receive $20,000.
Since 1950, there have been 50 abuse claims involving 28 clergy or others diocesan employees settled for almost $3 million, Shahid said. Those claims were not apart of the new settlement.
Richter, himself a Roman Catholic, said it is unclear how many other victims may come forward.
"What you find in this area is people can't just be molested and the next day step up to the plate and say 'I'm a victim,'" he said. "It's often after a very painful time in life."
Baker said in a letter published in the diocesan newspaper on Friday that he deeply regrets "the anguish of any individual who has suffered the scourge of childhood abuse and I am firmly committed to a just resolution of any instance in which a person who holds the responsibility of a protector has become a predator."
The settlement allows compensation for sexual abuse victims born before August 30, 1980, and their spouses and parents.
The attorneys said the 1980 date was negotiated generally to assure the settlement would cover victims who otherwise could not sue because the statute of limitations would have expired.
The agreement sets up an initial pool of $5 million. If $4 million of that is paid, a second pool of $7 million will be added.
Richter said they arrived at the $12 million figure by reviewing settlements throughout the country. An arbitrator will validate claims and determine the amount of compensation, according to the statement.
The diocese said it was encouraging anyone who was a victim to contact Richter.
John Barker, chief financial officer for the diocese, said the money would come from insurance, interest on investments and, if needed, selling church property.
"There have been dioceses that have declared bankruptcy," Shahid said. "The faithful should understand ... we have capped our liability at $12 million. Those (other) dioceses were faced with huge debts as a result of claims and were forced into bankruptcy."
Diocese officials in South Carolina have said the incidence of child abuse has been lower here than the national average during the past half century.
Statistics released by the church three years ago show that between 1950 and 2002 about 4 percent of all American Catholic clerics were accused of abuse compared with 2.7 percent of the clergy in South Carolina.
A former South Carolina priest who pleaded guilty last year to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature in the sexual abuse of two boys 30 years ago was the seventh former priest, coach or teacher in the diocese to plead guilty to abuse charges.
There are about 158,000 Catholics in South Carolina, almost four percent of the state population, according to the diocesan Web site.
A final hearing on the settlement will be held in early March.
Posted by Brad Warthen at 03:28 PM in In Our Time, Religion, Rule of Law, South Carolina
Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4ea353ef00d83512c63869e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Diocese settles sex abuse claims:
Comments
This looks like a reasonable settlement but for one thing. The guilty priests need to submit to "public caning" by any parishioners who want to swing the stick. The Baptist, Lutheran, Jewish, etc. ministers who have ruined young kid's lives should suffer the same fate. For once and for all, can we put a stop to this pedophilia?
Posted by: Dave | Jan 26, 2007 6:09:07 PM
Dave, there's been a new book written since the Old Testament. Give it a look. It's called the New Testament. It's the same book these parishioners have been reading.
Posted by: Randy Ewart | Jan 27, 2007 12:16:08 AM
The structure of the Catholic Church creates the environment where the opportunity for sexual misconduct is greater than in general society. The financial requirements of supporting the Catholic Church makes covering up misdeeds a necessity.
Celibacy is not natural.
Posted by: Doug | Jan 27, 2007 12:21:15 AM
Randy, Catholic parishioners are more outraged by what pedophilia has done to their church than you can imagine. Now if it were Episcopalians, I could understand the acceptance you infer.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 28, 2007 6:18:37 PM
Dave, if Catholic parishioners so outraged why don't they leave the church? The parishioners are part of the problem by continuing to support the Catholic church with their money and attendance.
Posted by: bud | Jan 29, 2007 10:59:48 AM
Bud, Catholics believe that Christ made Peter the first Pope and the church is actually the body of Christ. They also know that the clergy and hierarchy consists of humans, who sin and fail, as we all do. So, there is anger and disappointment in Catholic ranks, but if one abandons the body of Christ, what would they have left?
Posted by: Dave | Jan 30, 2007 6:36:14 AM
So Dave you support a religion that tacitly supports pedophilia then turn around and condem other religions. How can I take anything you say seriously?
Posted by: bud | Jan 30, 2007 10:41:20 AM
Here's a classic illustration of how logic breaks down completely when it comes to issues of religion. Dave defends the tenants of his religion but acknowledges disappointment in many of those who are high ranking members of that religion. It seems only logical to me that Dave should seek out a religious institution that both endorses Dave's beliefs AND has a history of leadership that ranks high in ethical standards. If none exists then why not just abandon the existing organization and practice on your religious faith on your own? But to continue to attend services and provide financial support to an organization that has callously abused young boys seems unconsciounable to me.
Let's take religion out of this discussion for a moment. Let's say I join an organization, say the ACLU, because I believe in the principals they stand for. The leadership of that organization finds out that large numbers of it's mid-level managers are taking advantage of young boys while they are on duty performing functions for the ACLU. But the leadership at the top covers up these events and even has many of it's guilty managers moved to other cities. And this happens over the course of 50 years. If I find out about this I would immediately turn in my ACLU card and demand justice, even though I believe in the stated principals of the ACLU. If another organzation is available to pursue the activities supported by ACLU I will join. If not, I will work on my own. But under no circumstances will I continue my association with a group that has acted so callously.
But somehow members of the Catholich church simply will not take similar action. It just doesn't make sense.
Posted by: bud | Jan 30, 2007 2:33:45 PM
As a newspaper editor and a Catholic, why does Mr. Warthen avoid the whole story - that over 90% of the pedophile priests were homosexuals?
I know that is not the way to keep your job in Big Media, but give it a try.
Posted by: Lee | Feb 9, 2007 11:05:51 PM
after all is said and done i will still wake up tommoro as a survivor! not as a victim anymore, as for the church? they don't seem to care about me or my other brothers who suffered at thier hands!why don't they call my family and ask if we are okay? and if they can do anything to help!!!we stand together (4) survivors..alone...
Posted by: john | Mar 22, 2007 11:32:21 AM
