« Separated at birth? | Main | Jake Knotts shocker! »

Saturday, 05 January 2008

Thompson's chance to make a difference: Bow out, endorse McCain

A NOTE ON THE NOTE: Thanks to John Bentley at the CBS blog for addressing the problem. All fixed now.

NOTE to visitors from the CBS blog: The blog item posted by John Bentley Saturday contained a serious error! This is Brad Warthen's Blog, and as such, it only reflects the thoughts of Brad Warthen. The jottings you find here are in no way the opinion of The State, South Carolina's largest newspaper. For further explanation, note this item.

Eight years ago, Fred Thompson came for an editorial board visit after we had already endorsed George Bush, to tell us how wrong we were. We should have backed John McCain, he told us. I knew that, of course, but I sat still for his gruff advice as a sort of penance for my failure. I had tried hard (more about that in my Sunday column), but the consensus on our board had gone against me.

As futile as his gesture was at that point, I still appreciated Sen. Thompson's position, as bad as it made me feel. McCain had been the man, and it was the nation's loss that he was not elected in 2000.

Since he knew that then, and Sen. McCain is the same man he was, I've wondered all year why in the world Mr. Thompson even thought of running. As I said back in this column, he forgot to do one thing when he jumped in late: Tell us what it was he brought to the campaign that the candidates already running did not already offer.

Now, it's my turn to return the favor and tell Fred Thompson something that he should already know: It's time for him to do the principled thing again, and assert what he knew to be true back then: He should bow out, and support McCain. And he should do it now; now is when he can make a difference.

Sen. McCain is tied for first place in New Hampshire polls with a damaged Mitt Romney; Mr. Thompson is in single digits. By the time he comes South, all he will be able to do is be a spoiler, to pull just enough voters away from another candidate (and I suspect that candidate would most likely be his longtime ally McCain) to throw the victory to the surging Huckabee.

Nothing against Huckabee on my part; I just don't see him as the alternative Mr. Thompson himself would prefer. Meanwhile, he has continued to express his continuing respect for Sen. McCain; this would be a chance to show he means it.

Speaking of Gov. Huckabee, his victory is his own. But he was not in a position to begin that rise, he was not in striking distance, until Sam Brownback gracefully departed from the race. They had both been drinking from the same well of voters, and Sen. Brownback clarified matters for them.

Quitting when he did was Sen. Brownback's greatest contribution to this campaign, and was the best thing he could have done to serve the values and ideas he espouses. If Sen. Thompson wants to advance his own values, if he wants to make a difference and serve the country -- or if he simply wants the gratification of being a player at all -- he should get behind McCain now.

Posted by Brad Warthen at 02:11 PM in Coming Attractions, Elections, Fred Thompson
Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4ea353ef00e54fbffbb68833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thompson's chance to make a difference: Bow out, endorse McCain:

Comments

I think that McCain should drop out and endorse Fred. You are completely wrong that Fred has not said what he brings to the table that the others don't. He brings conservatism across the board that none of the other, including McCain, bring.

He has repeated this dozens, if not hundreds, of times. If you haven't heard it, go to http://www.fred08.com/Principles/PrinciplesSummary.aspx and discover it.

Fred has the added benefit of actually having voted in line with his positions, which is in distinct variance with Governors Romney and Huckabee.

Posted by: Joel | Jan 5, 2008 3:15:36 PM

I owe my primary vote to Ron Paul for trying to restore Constitutional government for so many years. I will vote for Senator McCain if he is the last republican standing. However, if it comes down to Obama and Romney, I will vote for Obama. If it comes down to Clinton and Romney I will just stay home.
If Obama gets the nomination he is going to be hard to beat. I think the GOP's best shot against Obama is still Guliani.
The problem with McCain is he is past his prime. The country is in the mood for fresh meat and McCain is kind of stale. Ironically, Bush's ( yes I said Bush ) success in the war on terror may hurt McCain because the nation may have a false sense of security and may want to spend all the treasure on social programs. He has already failed on the immigration issue, so tell me Brad how does he win?

Posted by: Richard L. Wolfe | Jan 5, 2008 3:20:54 PM

Fred hasn't distinguished himself, are you kidding me??? Could he be any more diferent from those he is running against???

Please, pundits of the world, if you're going to take the time to write about Fred, do him the favor of listening to what he is saying first.

Posted by: DJ | Jan 5, 2008 3:25:10 PM

i agree joel, every man and woman in SC should take a look at fred08.com.

There is nobody in the race thats more consistantly conservative than Fred Thompson, period..

Take a look for yourself South Carolina, I'm sure you'll agree,

Immigration, Right to Life, Terrorism, National Defense, Social Security, etc...

Go Fred!!

Posted by: stlpatriot | Jan 5, 2008 3:27:08 PM

Let's get one thing straight....Fred is not dropping out! I sent him a little money to let him know we are still backing him all the way, this after the Iowa caucus. Some have it right (not you) that McCain should drop and support Fred which will never happen but it would be a good gesture on a man's part that wakes up each day and flips a coin to see if he is liberal or conservative for that day....I will stay with Fred as long as he stays in the race.

Posted by: Dick | Jan 5, 2008 3:38:35 PM

I agree with you, Brad. I like Fred a lot, but he has no chance to win this thing. I like him because he is a man of principle who truley loves his country. I believe he ran because he felt he could take the place of Sen. McCain, had his summer slump continued. It did not, he's back. Sen. Thompson needs to step back and re-evaluate what is best for his country. If McCain was put in the same position, I think he would drop out. As times would have it, he is the current favorite for the nomination. Fred is behind Ron Paul. (I base this off intrade.com). We love you Fred, but we do so because you make choices for the good of the country, not for your own personal ambition.

Posted by: Rob | Jan 5, 2008 3:52:52 PM

> until Sam Brownback gracefully departed from the race

That may be the most ridiculous statement I've ever read on this blog. You're making some sort of assumption that Brownback would have somehow split the 39% of the Iowa vote that Huckabee got? Hilarious. Brownback dropped out because he would have finished in 9th place in Iowa had he stayed in. Zero name recognition combined with zero personality results in zero percent of the vote.

Posted by: Doug | Jan 5, 2008 4:11:39 PM

....If McCain was put in the same position, I think he would drop out...
HA!
McCain was in a much worse position a few months ago when he pleaded for support for the McCain-Kennedy-Bush amnesty plan they tried to ramrod down our throats. McCain is back in the race only because people have forgotten (for now) what he did. His current denials of his support for amnesty might get him some short-term support, but will eventually serve as fodder for any opponent that wishes to expose his mendacity.
Fred did pretty good in IA considering his relatively late start and the compressed time-frame that prevented the social conservatives from really getting to know Huckabee.
Fred will pull support from Huck first. All the other Republican candidates are regarded as liberal. Huck's foolish followers think he is a conservative, like Fred is in fact, and they should switch to Fred if they really believe in the principles that Huck pretends to support.

Posted by: Allan Stewart | Jan 5, 2008 4:17:59 PM

Wrong. Fred and John may be friends, but there's no way Fred's going to drop out merely to endorse McCain's support of amnesty, man-made global warming, and opposition to the Bush tax cuts. South Carolina Republicans are not going to support McCain merely because he's a distinguished war veteran. And Mike Huckabee's class warfare simply will not play here. Fred's the real conservative, and he's in this for the long haul.

Posted by: Vince | Jan 5, 2008 4:30:31 PM

WELL WELL , another kool-aid drinking liberal strikes again ! I had been wondering when mccain will drop out for 4 months now , his campaigne is almost bankrupt , he finished 4th in Iowa , and South Carolinians proved they dont want him in 2000 .......Whats left , drop out with dignity after you lose on tuesday and through your support to the only REAL conservitive in the race , Fred D. Thompson . It's clear to me Obama will pull enough of the young independent voters of New Hampshire from Mcain to keep him a lower tier candidate . not to mention all the votes ron paul will get from independnts ...... sorry sen. , wont happen for you twice in New Hamshire !

Posted by: kevin | Jan 5, 2008 4:34:16 PM

TIME FOR MCCAIN TO GET OUT AND ENDORSE FRED. MCCAIN BLEW IT EARLY ON. MCCAIN WAS THE ANNOINTED ONE AT THE START. HE HAD A LOUSY TEAM WHO ROLLED HIM ON ALL THE MONEY HE RAISED. THE WORST PART OF MCCAIN IS THE FACT THAT HE IS PRO-AMNESTY. MCCAIN CUT HIS OWN THROAT.

Posted by: thestateisaschill | Jan 5, 2008 4:46:16 PM

Either McCain OR Bush was choosing the lesser of two evils and Bush was unquestionably the better of the two.

In going back over McCain's record combined with his several recent mindnumbing failures in pursuing socialism, not cutting taxes, infringing our inalienable rights, promoting bigger government and pursuing even more damage to our sovereignty, this argument isn't even debatable.

While he constantly offers he's a hero for his service in surviving capture of the enemy, I can now point to many military hero's who adamantly claim he is not and in his only other apparent stake to the highest office of our land inwhich he is for the war against terrorism ( which only the reasonable are )...this does not a president make, far from it.

Where his anger won't get us into trouble it will certainly hold us back and cause great turmoil from within and a dictator I'm not ready for...McCain isn't even material for a senator.


Fred Thompson merely needs to hang in there long enough for the people to know the records of the other's which will swiftly end their candidacies and rightly so.

Posted by: Winghunter | Jan 5, 2008 5:41:14 PM

I cannot believe what I just read. Fred Thompson is the ONLY Republican candidate that continues the Reagan Revolution. McCain is the one who should drop out and help restore a real conservative to the White House. I sure hope voters in the South are smarter than those in Iowa who brought into Huckabee's schtick. I truly gave Huckabee a chance to earn my support, but when light was shed on his record, I knew I wasn't leaving Thompson's side. McCain never had a chance with me or with it appears a majority of Republicans. Romney might as well be Bill Clinton as slick as he is. No thanks, give me Fred in 08!!!!!

Posted by: Dale | Jan 5, 2008 5:51:50 PM

Check it out folks, the news from an hour ago is that Robert Novak discovered that Mitt Romney's campaign was behind the Politico hit piece that said Thompson was going to drop out and support McCain..

The purpose was to cause strife between these two campaigns so no one could challendge Romney for 2nd place in Iowa.

Romney's campaign obviously feared that Thompson was gaining too much traction.

Posted by: Carlos | Jan 5, 2008 6:11:10 PM

Novak is another pundit that demonstrates he also doesn't have a clue on several issues although rumor has it that McCain's campaign was indicated also in this continued subversion of our election process.

Yet, Fred has weathered many such attacks even though they have taken their toll;

AP Gives Thompson the ‘04 Treatment
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127

Posted by: Winghunter | Jan 5, 2008 6:25:08 PM

Well, THAT was a lively discussion for a Friday. If I didn't know better, I'd think I was deliberately provoking folks just to get things stirred up on a slow blog day.

But I wasn't. If I'd wanted to do THAT, I would have put "Ron Paul" in the headline. That always does the trick.

As for the folks who have kindly suggested I'm not aware of what Sen. Thompson brings to the table, and have directed me to his Web site (which my main blog page links to, day in and day out), rest assured that I have BEEN out there and listened to Fred (just click on the link; there's video, shot by yours truly -- and here's more), and it is on the basis of that that I have written about his failure to explain why he's in the race (or not in the race, depending upon your perspective).

Anyway, look at the poll numbers and other factors in New Hampshire, read up on the situation there, and you might see where I'm coming from. Or not. Either way, thanks for joining in the discussion.

Posted by: Brad Warthen | Jan 5, 2008 8:37:57 PM

Brad-

With all due respect, Fred Thompson has talked at length on numerous occasions why he's in the race. Perhaps you need to need to actually undertake some due diligence and research the record, his answer is out there. And irregardless of the polls in NH, he is the only adult in the room who consistently stands on principle and tells the truth. That's not something to dismiss so casually as you do, and there are many voters across the country to whom that actually matters.

Posted by: Vince | Jan 5, 2008 10:06:26 PM

It woudn't sway me if Fred Thompson were to endorse John McCain. I won't vote for tax-cut-opposing, illegal-alien-amnestying, global-warming believer John McCain. If we can't elect a real Republican in 2008, then let the Democrats have the White House. Fred Thompson is that real Republican, and I'm planning to watch him take the Presidential oath of office on January 20, 2009. Go Fred!

Posted by: Doug Sterling | Jan 6, 2008 12:02:32 AM

Fred is in the race because the silent conservative base asked him to run and he accepted.

It's time McCain accepts defeat and gracefully steps out of the race.

Posted by: Acid Burn | Jan 6, 2008 12:16:26 AM

If Fred Thompson is the "real republican" that party is in worse shape than I have believed.

Brad, Meachum has a tremendous story on Newsweek.com about McCain as a principled presence. Such principles that do not amount to blind allegiance to the GOP is why Doug Sterling and other republicans hate him.

Some would rather support a candidate who doesn't really "care to run for president" and tiredly recites conservative platitudes than an American hero who works to eradicate government waste and puts principles over politics.

I think an Obama-McCain general election would be great for the country and a win-win in terms of recalibrating from Rove's divide and conquer public "service".

Posted by: Randy Ewart | Jan 6, 2008 12:16:38 AM

The poll numbers in New Hampshire? Fred's not competing there, just like McCain (and several others) didn't compete in Wyoming and Rudy didn't compete in Iowa and isn't competing in NH. They are all choosing their battles - putting precious resources in those states where they have a realistic shot.

Speaking of Wyoming, it has 12 post-penalty GOP delegates, same as New Hampshire. And Fred now has three of those delegates from placing second in the WY primary (Romney won, picking up 8, Duncan Hunter was third with 1 and Ron Paul fourth with 0. These four are the only candidates who bothered to compete in Wyoming).

Fred will do well in South Carolina.

Posted by: Josh Painter | Jan 6, 2008 12:17:54 AM

Then he was Fred. Now he's Mr. Thompson.

When you want something, you really butter them up, don't you, Mr. Warthen?

Posted by: weldon VII | Jan 6, 2008 1:17:04 AM

I supported Fred in Iowa and I'll support him as the only true conservative in the race all the way down the line.

Let me put it like this. I'll NEVER vote for McCain in any way, shape or form. Not no way, not no how!

He wanted Dems to cross party lines to vote for him in 2000, let them vote or him now.

Posted by: Dean | Jan 6, 2008 1:56:17 AM

hey i don't know but for me i need someone who looks exited. thompson really doesn't. but i would vote for him with all im worth. except that im voting for huckabee.
i have spent over 200 hours researching huckabee's record and have concluded that he has the best record. fred definitely comes in second. actually paul would except for his extreme foreign policy ideas. too bad. then except for hunter, the other 3 are lightyears behind. mitt, mcain, and guliani are horrible. i repeat, horrible.
thanks! sam

Posted by: sam | Jan 6, 2008 2:09:42 AM

McCain should be the one dropping out. Thompson is the only true conservative running with a chance to win the nomination... The rest of them -- with the exception of Duncan Hunter -- are NOT Conservatives. Each of them has proven this over the years -- look at their records, and what they did while in office, don't pay attention only to the words coming out of their mouths since they decided to run for President!

Thompson/Hunter in '08 -- the only REAL Conservatives in the race.

Posted by: LR | Jan 6, 2008 2:34:03 AM

Post a comment






 
About TheState.com | About the McClatchy Company | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement |Copyright