« Stem cells and the Kulturkampf see-saw | Main | Can you believe this guy? (I mean that in a NICE way) »

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

The news about me (among others)

Well, as you can see, I am in the news today. In the morning you'll see a further message about me and about the editorial department from our president and publisher, Henry Haitz (I'll link when it's available). In case you missed the news, here’s the short version: I’ll be leaving the newspaper after next week, as my position has been eliminated in this company’s quest for deep expense cuts.

I’m not sure what else to tell you, or how valuable such commentary from me would be. As y’all know, I’ve tried to keep y’all in the loop about the profound changes going on in this business, which have been accelerating in recent days. I’ve written about everything from the departure of my longtime friend and colleague Mike Fitts last year, to the really horrific news sweeping the industry in recent weeks, with some newspapers going under entirely.

This has not a comfortable thing for me to do. For one thing – I always wonder how much my readers will care. Someone I respected in college – actually, he taught a course in editorial writing that I took – warned us that when one talks about one’s own industry, one runs the risk of boring one’s audience.

For another reason, I recognize my own lack of detachment in writing about a subject that concerns me so directly. I’ve tried to be completely candid, but I have to wonder how successful I’ve been. Finally, there is such a delicate balance to strike between telling all that I know or imagine I know, which is my instinct as a journalist, and respecting the confidentiality of things I know only because I’m an officer of this company – which gives me both an unfair advantage and a responsibility to those I work with. It can be awkward.

Anyway, in spite of that, I’ve tried to keep y’all up-to-date. Last week, however, I did NOT share with you the fact that my colleague Denny Clements, the editorial page editor of the Myrtle Beach Sun News, was losing his position. I just felt too close to it to address it properly. I’ve known Denney since I was the news editor of the paper in Wichita, and he was an editorial writer there. And while he and I have not been personally close in the intervening years, I wasn’t comfortable getting into that. Besides, it would have raised the natural question of what the implications were for this newspaper, and I just didn’t know enough about that to tell you anything, so I waited until now to mention it. Here’s how Denney told his readers about it.

Now, as you can see, Denney’s situation was VERY close to my own. My last day is March 20.

I leave here with a deep love for this newspaper, which I hope has been evident over the last couple of decades. It seems to have been evident to Henry, by the kind and gracious things he had to say about my service in his note on tomorrow’s page. And I appreciate that.

What will I do next? I don’t know. Perhaps I should post my resume here, and see what happens.

I can tell you this much – I have zero intention of “relocating.” When I came to the state of my birth in 1987 after years in this business in Tennessee and Kansas, I did so with the intention of staying for good. My days as a newspaper vagabond were over. Either things worked out at The State, or I would find some other line of work. And the thing is, things worked out very well. The day I was interviewed here (for the job of governmental affair editor) I told Tom McLean that my ultimate goal was to become editorial page editor. I believed that position offered the greatest opportunity to serve my state, which I believed needed its largest newspaper to have a strong, frank, lively editorial page. I got my chance 10 years later, and I could not be more proud of the team I have had the privilege of working with, or the excellent job they have done – and which those who remain will continue to do, if I know them (and I do).

Obviously, this is a stressful time, but beneath it all is something that I don’t quite know how to describe, a sort of anticipation driven by curiosity. I wonder, with great interest, what will happen next. (That sounds either terribly trite or unintelligible; I can’t tell which, but I explained it as well as I could.)

Anyway, that’s all I have to say about this today. Maybe I’ll say more some other day. Oh, and if you wonder about the future of the blog, or whether it has one – I don’t know. That’s one of a lot of things that need to be figured out.

Posted by Brad Warthen at 06:02 PM
Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4ea353ef0112794654d728a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The news about me (among others):

Comments

Does Jake Knotts need a press secretary?

I'm sad to hear Robert Arial was let go, but with his talent he's probably already had offers.

Posted by: Bill C. | Mar 10, 2009 6:15:17 PM

Hope you keep your blog. Brad, I'm really sorry to hear you've lost your job. Unfortunately, the State is becoming less and less interesting. It's rapidly becoming not worth the money. At any rate, I can hope you're online at least somewhere, so we can all continue to disagree with almost anything you say. Keep us posted.

Posted by: Karen McLeod | Mar 10, 2009 6:22:13 PM

I'm very sad to hear that Brad Warthen will no longer be writing for The State. I don't know precisely what newspapers should be doing in this time of economic peril, but I do know that they do not get better by getting rid of their best people. Brad is a bright, talented, hard-working guy. I'm confident he'll be all right. I'm not so confident about newspapers.

Posted by: ed williams | Mar 10, 2009 6:43:17 PM

Brad,

There are many clichés that can be inserted here (“there is a silver lining in every dark cloud”, “it is for the best” etc., etc., etc.…) so I won’t waste the space. But suffice it to say you are deserving of my respect, and I wish you the best.

Be well, enjoy yourself, and take some chances. At our age, we don’t have many opportunities left for acting on our dreams.

God speed,

Curt Loftis, Jr.

Posted by: Curt Loftis | Mar 10, 2009 6:46:45 PM

Brad,

You run a mighty fine blog. Hopefully you are able to keep it up in some form or fashion.

Posted by: Birch Barlow | Mar 10, 2009 6:53:22 PM

Brad, this is incredibly bad news, not just for you, but for this entire state and community. I don't contribute nearly enough to your "marketplace of ideas" because I'm too willing to fight the partisan wars. But your thoughtfulness about the issues and your ability to articulate sound reasoning on public policy issues is something that's in short supply and will be greatly missed.

Two suggestions: 1.) keep blogging - somehow there has to be a way to make a living at this without the backing of a newspaper; 2.) give serious consideration to running for office - put the Unparty in action and on the map.

Posted by: Tim | Mar 10, 2009 6:55:19 PM

Brad, this is incredibly bad news, not just for you, but for this entire state and community. I don't contribute nearly enough to your "marketplace of ideas" because I'm too willing to fight the partisan wars. But your thoughtfulness about the issues and your ability to articulate sound reasoning on public policy issues is something that's in short supply and will be greatly missed.

Two suggestions: 1.) keep blogging - somehow there has to be a way to make a living at this without the backing of a newspaper; 2.) give serious consideration to running for office - put the Unparty in action and on the map.

Posted by: Tim | Mar 10, 2009 6:55:19 PM

I know I am one of the folks who offered up more criticism than praise over the years, but I'm sorry this has happened.

I've often thought if my epitaph reads "He cared," I would have done OK in this life. If this is the end of your newspaper days, I suggest that as a professional epitaph. It would seem to fit you.

I'll help you set up a Wordpress blog. Who needs McClatchy?


Posted by: notverybright | Mar 10, 2009 7:01:16 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fpupBCL6TE

Posted by: bill | Mar 10, 2009 7:35:24 PM

What a loss for The State's loyal readers. My thoughts are with you Brad. Look forward to following your work during what I know will be an important next chapter.

Posted by: Dan | Mar 10, 2009 7:37:58 PM

I hate to be petty, but...

NA NA NA NA, NA NA NA NA, HEY HEY HEY

GOODBYE!

Posted by: Johannesdesilencio | Mar 10, 2009 7:52:15 PM

Cue the band:

NA NA NA NA, NA NA NA NA, HEY HEY HEY

GOODBYE!

Posted by: Johannesdesilencio | Mar 10, 2009 7:58:13 PM

A third time-

NA NA NA NA, NA NA NA NA, HEY HEY HEY

GOODBYE

Posted by: Johannesdesilencio | Mar 10, 2009 7:59:37 PM

Smell ya later, Brad

Posted by: Johannesdesilencio | Mar 10, 2009 8:00:52 PM

Brad,

I am so sorry to hear it! :( You've been very tolerant of all the dissonant voices on this blog and I think you have your finger on the pulse of what makes S.C. work. You will be missed.

What are your plans? Hope it's something good!

Posted by: Rich | Mar 10, 2009 8:11:26 PM

I'm sorry to hear about the loss of your job, Brad. I hope you find another position quickly. I've learned much from your writings, and I appreciate your Unparty approach to politics. I'll be including you in my prayers. God Bless.

Posted by: Norm Ivey | Mar 10, 2009 8:24:10 PM

I don't think the public realizes what an enormous loss the collapse of the newspaper industry means to our democracy.

The slow, steady decline of The State newspaper is a terrible blow to us all, whether you agree with their editorials or not. If any group of people needs a watchdog, it's the elected officials in Columbia. Who will keep tabs on them? Who will take them to task when they inevitably stray?

I wasn't in agreement with many editorials in The State, but I always considered it must-reading. And Brad was among the first to experiment with blogging, always open to criticism and opposing opinions.

Thanks for all your good work Brad. I'm sure an exciting opportunity is waiting for you around the corner.

Posted by: mark_g | Mar 10, 2009 8:32:39 PM

Brad, I gasped when I heard the news. You know I've always told you that you speak for me - things I think, you write. I just can't believe it! You will be missed.

Posted by: Mary Pat | Mar 10, 2009 8:47:08 PM

Columbia's elected officials don't inevitably stray -- they periodically show up faithful.

That usually happens around November.

FITSNEWS will hold their feet to the fire.

Even if that means FITS' feets get hot, too.

Posted by: Groucho | Mar 10, 2009 8:54:36 PM

What is happening in the newspaper industry is what is happening in all industries. The finance people are making management decisions. The financial crunch is making more and more American businesses short sighted in their approach. Thus, divisions, plants, branches or papers that turn a profit are served with layoffs to help compensate for the non-performing parts of their larger corporation.

It is the new style of American business. There was once a time if a paper in Texas lost money and The State made money, the paper in Texas would be shut down and The State would continue to operate as is. And while that model made America an economic power, it is no more.

You, and the machinist in a profitable plant laid off, are dealing with the new age of American business, where simply making money for the company isn't enough to keep your job. Now, American business puts emphasis on other priorities, such as financial gamesmanship, who has what degree and from where, and political considerations. Add to that the profound lack of loyalty in American business.

Good luck to you and frankly, to all of us. Dave Thomas would not have stood a chance today's world. Nor would Sam Walton.

.

Posted by: Brian McCarty | Mar 10, 2009 9:03:50 PM

Wow, I don't know what to say. I feared this day would come, but I hoped it wouldn't come so soon. Where are we going to get the thoughtful analysis that Brad and others have brought to this state? Even when we didn't agree with Brad, we could count on him to look at challenges from all angles, instead of the knee-jerk and ideology-fed reactions that are so common.

This is a sad day for South Carolina, and somehow a sad day for me. I feel like we're losing a "prophetic voice," someone who has challenged us all to think and act more clearly.

All the best to you, Brad.

It seems so trite to end that way, but I don't know what else to say.

Posted by: Herb Brasher | Mar 10, 2009 9:23:57 PM

Hey Brad, I hope that you find your way soon. Perhaps you'll find opportunities that were not previously visible. Professionally, I've always felt you were thoughtful and fair (except for the McCain stuff! - sorry, couldn't help myself).

I think this is a tremendous loss for the community and The State. The former loses out because the media holds public officials accountable. This transition to a reliance on Internet media is scary because any yahoo can post opinions guised as news. People will believe it because it's in print. The State has tremendous credibility, despite what the naysayers believe. The State now becomes significantly less interesting.

Will you write? Travel? Both? I'd be interested in hearing about your exploits. I wish you well and hope you find some solace at St. Peters.

La Paz.

Posted by: Randy E | Mar 10, 2009 9:34:53 PM

I don't know Brian. Seems to me that in the newspaper business, the financial people start making management decisions pretty much only after management people have made a l-o-n-g series of really poor decisions about content and bias in the paper.

I do not enjoy seeing people lose their jobs, but it can hardly be argued that what is happening at The State is in any way a surprise.

The people who have managed this newspaper and determined its slant and content over the last 15 years have insisted upon and arrogantly/obstinately set a course for the paper that has alienated its audience. The result has been a predictable and inexorable decline in readership followed naturally by a decline in ad revenue. Why would businesses advertise in a paper which is read by fewer people year upon year?

There isn't a problem with paper because financial people are making management decisions. Financial people are forced to make management because there are fundamental problems with the paper.

Dave

Posted by: David | Mar 10, 2009 9:36:59 PM

Brad,
This really sucks. Good luck and keep pushing the un-party.

Posted by: WWB | Mar 10, 2009 9:59:53 PM

Brad,
I'm stunned, and you will be dearly missed, and I wish you all the best. Thank you for all your thoughtfulness, hard work, dedication, and kindness.
Regards,
Michael Rodgers

Posted by: Michael Rodgers | Mar 10, 2009 10:16:52 PM

Post a comment






 
About TheState.com | About the McClatchy Company | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement |Copyright